*nod nod* I agree that there were plot holes en masse. I liked the CSI effects, the way we saw Langdon decipher the text and the way flashback and real time merged. And yeah, Ian McKellan camped it up. Heee. He was fun. Paul Bettany was pretty good too, although I don't like him as a villain. I like him better as Chaucer or as the tennis player in "Wimbledon".
I tried to read another Dan Brown novel, but sheesh, it's utter shite. I find it next to impossible to read.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2006-05-30 12:26 pm (UTC)I agree that there were plot holes en masse. I liked the CSI effects, the way we saw Langdon decipher the text and the way flashback and real time merged.
And yeah, Ian McKellan camped it up. Heee. He was fun. Paul Bettany was pretty good too, although I don't like him as a villain. I like him better as Chaucer or as the tennis player in "Wimbledon".
I tried to read another Dan Brown novel, but sheesh, it's utter shite. I find it next to impossible to read.